Every plan sponsor knows the feeling, employees come and go, but their 401(k) balances often stay behind like unpacked boxes from a move three years ago. It seems harmless, even administrative convenience at first. Then reality hits: more accounts, more notices, more fees, more fiduciary responsibility, and more opportunity for something to go wrong.<\/p>\n
The problem isn\u2019t personal. it\u2019s structural. Former employees still count when calculating audit thresholds, per-participant fees, disclosures, and cybersecurity exposure. They remain beneficiaries of plan decisions long after they\u2019ve stopped badge-swiping into the building. And if there\u2019s uncashed checks or missing participants? That\u2019s your problem too.<\/p>\n
Encouraging former employees to roll over or cash out (within the rules, without advice, and without coercion) isn\u2019t about pushing people out, it\u2019s about plan health. A streamlined participant base means:<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Lower administrative burden<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Reduced audit costs<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Fewer abandoned accounts and lost participants<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Less fiduciary risk on stale records<\/p>\n
A 401(k) plan is not a storage facility. When former employees leave their accounts indefinitely, sponsors shoulder ongoing responsibility without the ongoing relationship.<\/p>\n
Helping people transition their savings cleanly and efficiently isn\u2019t just housekeeping \u2014 it\u2019s good governance. And sometimes, the best way to take care of a retirement plan is to help those who\u2019ve already walked out the door keep walking, right into their next account.<\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Every plan sponsor knows the feeling, employees come and go, but their 401(k) balances often stay behind like unpacked boxes from a move three years ago. It seems harmless, even administrative convenience at first. Then reality hits: more accounts, more … Continue reading