Over the last few years, we\u2019ve seen the proliferation of companies offering ERISA \u00a73(16) services. This is a natural growth of advisors offering ERISA \u00a73(38) services, so 3(16) was a great way for third-party administrators (TPAs). Like 3(38), TPAs and other providers could offer 3(16) as an outsourcing solution where employers can outsource the headache of plan administration to a 3(16) named fiduciary.<\/p>\n
The \u201cPlan Administrator\u201d of a qualified retirement plan is defined in section 3(16) of ERISA. The Plan Administrator should not be confused with a \u201cPension Administrator\u201d or a TPA.<\/p>\n
Unlike the TPA, the Plan Administrator has the following primary responsibilities:<\/p>\n
\u25e6 Ensures all filings with the federal government (form 5500, etc.) are timely made;<\/p>\n
\u25e6 Makes important disclosures to plan participants;<\/p>\n
\u25e6 Hires plan service providers if no other fiduciary has that responsibility; and<\/p>\n
\u25e6 Fulfills other responsibilities as outlined in plan documents.<\/p>\n
A TPA has delegated these responsibilities, but the plan sponsor bears the responsibility. The \u00a73(16) fiduciary\/administrator assumes that responsibility, as the plan sponsor outsources it.<\/p>\n
This is great, isn\u2019t it? While I have been working with TPAs and financial advisors in trying to help them offer these services (cheap plug), I do see an issue. Unlike a \u00a73(21) or \u00a73(38) fiduciary that requires some sort of registration as a financial advisor, a \u00a73(16) administrator much like a TPA does not need any accreditation. So nothing would stop someone from coming in out of nowhere and proclaiming themselves as the king or queen of 3(16) fiduciaries without having either the competence and\/or honesty to be one. This industry has had its share of incompetent and\/or fraudulent plan providers and without any requirement to be one, there will be an issue when a 3(16) administrator does go badly. Just look at the Vantage Benefits fiasco where a Dallas-based TPA offering 3(16) stole millions in plan assets.<\/p>\n
Another issue is that there is a wide variety of services that ERISA \u00a73(16) may offer from a heavy 3(16) where they offer support with payroll reports and a light 3(16) where they may not even sign the Form 5500. So as a plan sponsor searching for 3(16) providers, you need to vet them as well as understand what services they may provide.<\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Over the last few years, we\u2019ve seen the proliferation of companies offering ERISA \u00a73(16) services. This is a natural growth of advisors offering ERISA \u00a73(38) services, so 3(16) was a great way for third-party administrators (TPAs). Like 3(38), TPAs and … Continue reading