Question for TPAs re: 3(16)

This is one of the very few times, I am asking for two cents on a specific situation instead of offering my two cents.

As I have discussed before, I believe that ERISA §3(16) administrator/fiduciary services can be one of the next big things out there. But it’s not the solution for all plan sponsors and it’s not a solution for some third party administrators (TPAs) to offer.

So my question is for TPAs. If for some reason you have no interest in offering 3(16) services (and there are a few reasons), would you offer the services of a third party who only offered 3(16) services? Just asking for a colleague of mine who is interested in offering a 3(16) service and does absolutely no TPA work.

Please let me know through e-mails, blog posts, or posts in LinkedIn.

Thank you.

This entry was posted in 401(k) Plans, Retirement Plans. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Question for TPAs re: 3(16)

Leave a Reply to Dale F. Smith Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *